RockPeak / Crushing & screening
Crushing and Screening Line Upgrade for a Philippine Quarry
Philippines / Quarry & aggregate processing / Source project account, 2025
Project at a glance
- Region
- Philippines
- Industry
- Quarrying & aggregate processing
- Year stated
- 2025
- Equipment stated
- RP-JC-1200 Jaw Crusher
RP-IC-1315 Impact Crusher
Customer identity is withheld pending publication permission. Project facts remain source-reported.
The operating context
A Philippine quarry and aggregate operator needed to expand supply while dealing with limited output from an aging line and rising maintenance costs. The supplied project draft describes a RockPeak jaw-and-impact crushing and screening line that retained staged processing while improving the match between primary and subsequent crushing.
Identify the production bottleneck behind the supply requirement
The original line processed approximately 80 t/h. Maintenance stoppages associated with aging equipment also affected continuous supply. Hourly output is only one part of a quarry’s production capacity: if feeding, crushing and screening are not coordinated, material can accumulate or equipment can wait even when an individual machine has a high rated range. The upgrade therefore needed to consider both stable operation and cost per unit of output.
Match staged crushing to the processing task
The project draft specifies an RP-JC-1200 Jaw Crusher for primary crushing followed by an RP-IC-1315 Impact Crusher, combined with feeding, conveying and screening equipment. The jaw crusher reduces large feed; the impact crusher handles the subsequent material where it suits the operating conditions; screening separates the required grades. This arrangement assigns a clear processing role to each item of equipment.
Combine installation and commissioning with operator training
The supplied account states that the equipment was delivered in 2025, site installation and commissioning took approximately three weeks, and RockPeak engineers provided on-site operator training. For comparable line projects, commissioning should cover equipment connections, no-load checks, gradual introduction of feed and coordination between stages, rather than simply checking whether each machine starts. Training should also explain the relationship between feed changes, discharge settings and screening load so that operators can identify abnormal conditions during daily production.
Evidence and image context
No signed acceptance record, measured production log, cost-calculation basis or customer publication permission has been supplied. This image is a supplied cover, not verified proof of the equipment scope.
Assess the upgrade through the performance of the whole line
The project draft reports an increase in throughput from approximately 80 t/h to 180 t/h and a reduction of approximately 30% in crushing cost per tonne. Supporting acceptance records, measurement methods and publication permission have not been supplied. These figures describe the source account of this project under its own material and operating conditions; they are not a production or return guarantee for another quarry. A comparison should use a consistent measurement basis and include operating time, maintenance input, wear-part consumption and usable finished-product output.
Discuss your project requirements
Describe your material, maximum feed, target output, required grades and project location. Equipment and commercial scope need confirmation against these inputs.
Preview only: this form validates locally and does not send information.